Subject:
|
Re: usage stats
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Jul 1999 21:32:11 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
kloch@STOPSPAMMERSnospmkl.net
|
Viewed:
|
256 times
|
| |
|
|
301's are moved permanently. Not exactly errors.
Example:
if someone links to or types http://www.kl.net/scans it will generate 2
log entries,
first the 301 response and the subsequent http://www.kl.net/scans/
that the browser then grabs. I used to have a significant number
of those, because I diddn't have trailing slashes in any of the
hrefs on my pages (oops!).
IMO It's perfectly ok to count 304's, they indicate a user is accessing
the object again, but they will probably get it from their cache instead
of your server. If browsers always access the object anyway, that too
would result in 2 for one hits, but that isn't usually the case unless
someone hit's reload.
KL
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin Loch writes:
> > Do the raw hits and page views numbers exclude 301 errors?
> > I found that these can skew the numbers a bit.
>
> Hmm, 3xx's aren't errors, are they? Do you mean 304's? -- there are tons
> of those, but only a tiny handful of 301's.
>
> But anyway -- good question! Lemme see...
>
> 86.1% of the requests result in 200 ("OK"), and 12.9% of the requests result
> in 304 ("Not Modified"). Everything else together is 1%.
>
> So I'll count 200's only.
>
> Counting 200's only, the raw hit count is ~69,800 per day and the page-view
> count is ~26,200 per day (averaged over the past 21 days). So my numbers
> were off -- the raw hits were inflated by approximately 15% and the page
> views were inflated by approximately 5%. Sorry, I should have thought of
> that. Thanks for asking. :-)
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: usage stats
|
| (...) So when places talk about "page views per day" they probably are including 304's? :-) I'd guess so, because it helps inflate the numbers, heheh. --Todd (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: usage stats
|
| (...) Hmm, 3xx's aren't errors, are they? Do you mean 304's? -- there are tons of those, but only a tiny handful of 301's. But anyway -- good question! Lemme see... 86.1% of the requests result in 200 ("OK"), and 12.9% of the requests result in 304 (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
