Subject:
|
Re: usage stats
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Jul 1999 04:11:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
266 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin Loch writes:
> Do the raw hits and page views numbers exclude 301 errors?
> I found that these can skew the numbers a bit.
Hmm, 3xx's aren't errors, are they? Do you mean 304's? -- there are tons
of those, but only a tiny handful of 301's.
But anyway -- good question! Lemme see...
86.1% of the requests result in 200 ("OK"), and 12.9% of the requests result
in 304 ("Not Modified"). Everything else together is 1%.
So I'll count 200's only.
Counting 200's only, the raw hit count is ~69,800 per day and the page-view
count is ~26,200 per day (averaged over the past 21 days). So my numbers
were off -- the raw hits were inflated by approximately 15% and the page
views were inflated by approximately 5%. Sorry, I should have thought of
that. Thanks for asking. :-)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: usage stats
|
| 301's are moved permanently. Not exactly errors. Example: if someone links to or types (URL) it will generate 2 log entries, first the 301 response and the subsequent (URL) the browser then grabs. I used to have a significant number of those, (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: usage stats
|
| Do the raw hits and page views numbers exclude 301 errors? I found that these can skew the numbers a bit. KL (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
