 | | Re: usage stats —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) (Not up on any page anywhere, no.) (...) As of right now, there are 1,441 unique email/name combinations from 1,173 unique people. Plus anyone gatewayed in through the lego-robotics@crynwr.com mailing list (linked to lugnet.robotics) or the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: usage stats —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | Do the raw hits and page views numbers exclude 301 errors? I found that these can skew the numbers a bit. KL (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: usage stats —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Hmm, 3xx's aren't errors, are they? Do you mean 304's? -- there are tons of those, but only a tiny handful of 301's. But anyway -- good question! Lemme see... 86.1% of the requests result in 200 ("OK"), and 12.9% of the requests result in 304 (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: usage stats —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | | 301's are moved permanently. Not exactly errors. Example: if someone links to or types (URL) it will generate 2 log entries, first the 301 response and the subsequent (URL) the browser then grabs. I used to have a significant number of those, (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: usage stats —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) So when places talk about "page views per day" they probably are including 304's? :-) I'd guess so, because it helps inflate the numbers, heheh. --Todd (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: usage stats —Josh Spaulding
|
| | | | (...) Thanks. I was just kind of curious. A while ago the subject of including banner ads in LUGNET came up. I just want to say that I would have not problem with them if they're useful for funding the site. If the profit from them is negligible, (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
