 | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Greg Majewski
|
| | | How about people just use whatever they have been called in the past? As for new members and garbage names, you could have a submit area that sends chosen names to a special LUGNET email, where they then could be manually read, and the garbage names (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) That was a thought, but think about it from the censorship standpoint: On the legal side, when you start trying to filter out things that are offensive or vulgar or profane, you open yourself up to more scrutiny if you then accidentally miss (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Greg Majewski
|
| | | | | (...) If you look at this situation from how it exists already, you will find that 99% of the internet's Lego community are civilized adults, the rest being civilized teenagers or whatever, so you don't really have to worry about "gray areas," at (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Oh, believe me, I *have* looked at it...! :-) Been seriously looking at this on and off for years... (...) The gray areas I'm thinking of aren't so much the offensive or vulgar things (although I'm sure there are some things which are both (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Greg Majewski
|
| | | | | | | (...) Oh! Oh! I can explain this one! My last name is pronounced muh-JEH-skee, but people always say muh-JOOS-kee, which led to the nickname Juice for me. Also, my favorite color is orange which led some people to call me Orange Juice, which let to (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Hey, that's a pretty great story! It's always fun to hear how nicknames come about. (...) Well, keep in mind, the goal here is to discourage (in a mechanical way) general "aliases" or "handles" or "screen names." You probably wouldn't be able (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Greg Majewski
|
| | | | | | | | (...) No, my father's first name is Michael and he is the one who registered our internet service. With my service, you can only have one "name," so it has always been Mmaje for me until I registered with Yahoo!, but even then when I posted to RTL, (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo —Robert Munafo
|
| | | | | | This isn't a complaint, just a suggestion. If you're going to try to spell phonetics you should adopt a technically precise notation. For example, you said: (...) It's not at all clear whether you intend your syllable "MUHK" to rhyme with "book" or (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Excellent! OK, by SAMPA, it would yup definitely be /lVg" net/ (thanks!). (And, BTW, I had heard of a "glottal stop" before, but I never knew there was such a thing as a "nasal sonorant" or a "bilabial fricative"! I'm thinkin' TomMcD and (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo —Robert Munafo
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I don't actually know a sonorant from a fricative either, aside from what I can figure out by looking at the examples. But if Tom and Jeremy are into linguistics they probably already know more about it than we do {-; (...) You can use it if (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Fortunately, you don't expect me to pass this one up. (...) That's okay. It's a little-known fact that a sonorant is the high-pitched sqawking sound made by someone rapidly applying a rubber eraser to a pencil mark on a shaky metal table. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | sonorants and fricatives —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) LOL!!! I'm laughing so hard I can hardly breathe. God, what I would give for a daily word-definition like that by e-mail in the morning, or an "Ask Jeremy" box on a web page where you could ask what a word meant. :) --Todd (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | | | (...) It's a "smart-ass thing" actually. (...) can (...) The first table-joint lubricant, made largely of walrus fat oil and safflower extract, was called "Dr. Numba's Anti-Sonorant Potion". Dr. Numba was an alias of a former carpet-bagger turned (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Avid "Northern Exposure" fans might recall that a bilabial fricative refers to the state of mind one achieves while awaiting an answer from an Athapascan spirit while consming bilibiatho (1) blowing in from Inuit grounds. Cheers, - jsproat 1. (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Hostess Sno-balls are good example of the usage of this substance. -Tom McD. when replying, little wedge-shaped spamcakes make good climbing pitons. (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | phonetics —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Hmm. Y'know, you're right! -- I should've simply written MUCK. By MUHK, I was trying to get the "uh" sound. I'm no phoneticist! :) Anyway, so his last named is actually pronounced MUCK-ow, but we incorrectly pronounced it MOO-kow (or MUKE-ow), (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I assumed Todd *did* mean 'MUHK' to rhyme with 'muck'. I didn't think about it at the time, but 'UH' doesn't look much like it should be pronounced like the sounds in either "book" or "fluke". Steve (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo —Robert Munafo
|
| | | | | | | (...) That's essentially the problem with colloquial phonetic spelling -- there are two methods. Some people (like me) use existing words whenever existing words are available: Todd: "TODD", Lugnet: "LUG-net", Steve: "STEVE", phonetic: (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | O vs WO vs AH —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Hey, how close is that to TWOD? (I gather that's the native-East-Coast way to pronounce it -- similar to BWOS'-tin. :) Where I grew up (Minneapolis) it's pronounced TAHD, but not quite the nasal TAAHHHD that they say in Milwaukee and Chicago. (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: O vs WO vs AH —John Bauman
|
| | | | | | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message <37a0e8e2.108331275@...et.com>... (...) Is the east coast you refer to the upper part of maine? I never heard it pronounced like that. (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: O vs WO vs AH —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | | (...) Ah, a great mystery of life has become revealed. Now I understand Todd's attraction to LEGO. Being from Mininoplace, he naturally took to minifigs. :') (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Anders Isaksson
|
| | | | Todd Lehman skrev i meddelandet <377fa446.2704266@lu...et.com>... (...) Yeah, and don't forget other languages! What's perfectly clean in English, may be an insult in another language (no examples will be given), and vice versa. As a side note (I (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) That's another reason to restrict the member-ID's only to representations of real-life names...that way, if something happens to be obscene in another language, it's obvious that it was based directly on someone's name, and not obscene on (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
