To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 371
370  |  372
Subject: 
Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Thu, 29 Jul 1999 22:38:53 GMT
Viewed: 
1992 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Steve Bliss writes:
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 21:59:37 GMT, "Robert Munafo" <munafo@gcctech.com>
wrote:
It's not at all clear whether you intend your syllable "MUHK" to rhyme
with "book" or with "fluke" (you didn't mean "muck" because then you
would have just typed "MUCK").

I assumed Todd *did* mean 'MUHK' to rhyme with 'muck'.  I didn't think
about it at the time, but 'UH' doesn't look much like it should be
pronounced like the sounds in either "book" or "fluke".

That's essentially the problem with colloquial phonetic spelling -- there are
two methods. Some people (like me) use existing words whenever existing words
are available:

  Todd: "TODD", Lugnet: "LUG-net", Steve: "STEVE", phonetic: "foe-NEH-tick"

and other people (perhaps including you) always use a certain letter pair for
each different vowel sound:

  Todd: "TAWD", Lugnet: "LUHG-neht", Steve: "STEEV", phonetic: "foh-NEH-tihk"

Both methods have advantages and disadvantages, but they're incompatible, and
if you use the second method, there is no agreed-upon single consistent system
for representing the 20 or so vowel sounds that occur in English. That's
complicated by all the dialects.

-Robert Munafo



Message has 1 Reply:
  O vs WO vs AH
 
(...) Hey, how close is that to TWOD? (I gather that's the native-East-Coast way to pronounce it -- similar to BWOS'-tin. :) Where I grew up (Minneapolis) it's pronounced TAHD, but not quite the nasal TAAHHHD that they say in Milwaukee and Chicago. (...) (26 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo
 
(...) I assumed Todd *did* mean 'MUHK' to rhyme with 'muck'. I didn't think about it at the time, but 'UH' doesn't look much like it should be pronounced like the sounds in either "book" or "fluke". Steve (26 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR