To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 371
370  |  372
Subject: 
Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Thu, 29 Jul 1999 22:38:53 GMT
Viewed: 
3263 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Steve Bliss writes:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 21:59:37 GMT, "Robert Munafo" <munafo@gcctech.com>
> wrote:
> > It's not at all clear whether you intend your syllable "MUHK" to rhyme
> > with "book" or with "fluke" (you didn't mean "muck" because then you
> > would have just typed "MUCK").
> 
> I assumed Todd *did* mean 'MUHK' to rhyme with 'muck'.  I didn't think
> about it at the time, but 'UH' doesn't look much like it should be
> pronounced like the sounds in either "book" or "fluke".

That's essentially the problem with colloquial phonetic spelling -- there are
two methods. Some people (like me) use existing words whenever existing words
are available:

  Todd: "TODD", Lugnet: "LUG-net", Steve: "STEVE", phonetic: "foe-NEH-tick"

and other people (perhaps including you) always use a certain letter pair for
each different vowel sound:

  Todd: "TAWD", Lugnet: "LUHG-neht", Steve: "STEEV", phonetic: "foh-NEH-tihk"

Both methods have advantages and disadvantages, but they're incompatible, and
if you use the second method, there is no agreed-upon single consistent system
for representing the 20 or so vowel sounds that occur in English. That's
complicated by all the dialects.

-Robert Munafo



Message has 1 Reply:
  O vs WO vs AH
 
(...) Hey, how close is that to TWOD? (I gather that's the native-East-Coast way to pronounce it -- similar to BWOS'-tin. :) Where I grew up (Minneapolis) it's pronounced TAHD, but not quite the nasal TAAHHHD that they say in Milwaukee and Chicago. (...) (27 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo
 
(...) I assumed Todd *did* mean 'MUHK' to rhyme with 'muck'. I didn't think about it at the time, but 'UH' doesn't look much like it should be pronounced like the sounds in either "book" or "fluke". Steve (27 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR