To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1549
    Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
    (...) TOLD you we didn't need to pick on your orientation. (myself, I prefer north facing, keeps the moss out of my eyes) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
   
        Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Ed Jones
   (...) north side of the tree. Wouldn't the moss be in Larry's eyes. Larry moss be wrong again :') (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
   
        Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
     (...) I have eyes in the back of my head. And they're bigger than my stomach. So no, you're barking up the wrong tree, leave it alone. (I pruned lugnet.off-topic.fun from the groups list) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
    
         Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —John Neal
      (...) gonna leaf it alone, eh? It was a lawn time coming. (...) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
    
         Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
     (...) Mown. (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
   
        Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Steve Bliss
   (...) Does Larry have moss in his eyes? No? See, it works. Steve (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
   
        Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Christopher L. Weeks
   (...) He must be in the Southern hemisphere, at least at the time of writing. This is plausible...He appears to travel a great deal. (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
   
        Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
   (...) Chris Weeks (1) has once again explained things for the benefit of those unbelievers who didn't immediately leap to the correct conclusion... that I was speaking from an OZ perspective. Oh, you doubters, you try me so. Be of good cheer, (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
   
        Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Christopher L. Weeks
   (...) What? Have I been doing this too much of late? I just like to come up with the explanations. And isn't acolyte a piece of Catholic jargon anyway? In what way are you linked to His Holiness? (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
   
        Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
    (...) We're both Polish? But no, acolyte is generic. (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR