 | | Re: contacting me via e-mail
|
|
(...) LUGNET email generally seems to have been broken for a while, including the method to validate messages via email: (URL) 1 March 2006 (URL) 17 Feb 2006 (URL) 30 Jan 2006 so maybe some of those 900,000 are connected with that. I also wonder if (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: (><)
|
|
(...) If you need to vent, please do so. It's better than holding it in. Venting isn't immature, unless it's whining, which really isn't venting anyway (and I don't see you doing that). If not one of the off-topic groups, perhaps one of the .people (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Emails not being answered
|
|
(...) Thank you for your reply Suzanne. Please understand I'm not looking for a refund. I'm looking to become a member! (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: contacting me via e-mail
|
|
(...) That's exactly right. (...) Sure, yeah. [nodding] And that's -horrible- if you ask me! Esp with the potential for robotics discussion coming up with the release of the NXT sets. I'm going to open a ticket with Pair Networks' support staff (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: dot mecha curator request
|
|
(...) Look at that! Someone makes a Paypal payment today, and gets his membership right away. I made a Paypal payment on February 11th, and nothing! I guess being vocal in private email isn't good enough. I've got to be vocal in the newsgroups! Nice (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lowering noise
|
|
(...) I have a question - and it echos (URL) post> that went unanswered/ignored. What was done to the people who baited and flamed? To me thier actions were far worse than Eric's. It seems that the trolls, baiters and flamers got away scott free. (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: lowering noise
|
|
(...) You know, I had a big reply I was about to post, but that I thought of what (URL) Suz said:> "Know when to drop it. Some people have a difficult time quitting arguments. Either they're afraid of losing face, they insist on having the last (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: lowering noise
|
|
(...) I don't see Mark pursuing 'an agenda' here at all, I see him following up on a perfectly reasonable question that wasn't answered initially. Here are his exact words: "What was done to the people who baited and flamed?" He goes on to say he (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: lowering noise
|
|
(...) It seemed to me he was trying to show a percieved double standard. While I do disagree with the use of the term "flaming" here in this thread (I consider flaming to be a post in order to denigrate another individual openly and and for no (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: lowering noise
|
|
(...) Jeff Stembel summed up my motives for response very well (better than I have so far) in his (URL) response> to Mark so I won't bother trying to explain them again. (...) I'm a bit suspicious as to why we are getting so many admins from BZPower (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
