To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 13365 (-20)
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
If Jon's text doesn't get the message across, check out the number of highlights his post received. I for one am sick of Lugnet and it's drama. It's not even worth posting my MOCs here anymore. Why should I even try, knowing that any post I make (...) (18 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
(...) I thought about this post for quite sometime last night. I couldn't respond then because I was too angry. Sophie may be annoying, and he may even violate TOS on a regular basis. But the blatent abandonment of this community by its (...) (18 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
Sorry, screwed up that link: (URL) -Keith (18 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
(...) How is that "make lots of good posts about LEGO" thing working out? (URL) Look I realize I'm on shaky ground here, considering my posting history, but you're going to tell me you can't somehow get rid of this post? Or ban the person who posted (...) (18 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
(...) Your error in judgement is thinking that ANY reply does anything to correct his behavior. I fully support Jon's call for Eric being banned. Not because of the constant annoying noise that we all know he is capable of. But the abusive, violent (...) (18 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
(...) Wow. I think he broke almost all of those. Soren (18 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
In lugnet.general, Jon Palmer wrote: ... (...) I refuse to get angry. It's bad for my health. But I understand why people are upset, believe me. I met with Todd last night regarding LUGNET. Currently, there isn't anything I can do about the (...) (18 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote: <snipage> (...) I think hurting e is less of an intention and more of a beneficial side effect of correcting his behaviour. ;-) Jude (18 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
Now, I'm jumping in too :p (...) I agree with what you say here. Part of the problem with Lugnet has been the lack of available consequences for breaching the TOS. The only "sticks" available are suspension or banning, which often seems a bit too (...) (18 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
In lugnet.general, Jon Palmer wrote: Well said, Jon. I agree wholeheartedly. For once Im glad one of the lurkers spoke up. ;) (snippery) (...) This is probably the thing that shits me most of all. Eric is a chronic nuisance on this site. Time and (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
Jon is right. I've defended Eric in the past when I thought he was being abused, but this clearly not the case here. Eric should be suspended for a while for this obvious violation of the TOS. -JSM (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
I tried so hard to stay out of this farce but I can't help it any longer. Normally Eric's antics are at least entertaining, but now I'm mad. This is what pushed me over the edge: (...) What is WRONG with you people?! Suzanne?! I can't believe this (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !! 
 
  Re: LUGNET Logo abuse on Ebay
 
(...) Thank you, Rob. I just sent them a message too. -Suz (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: LUGNET Logo abuse on Ebay
 
(...) I sent the shop a note, let's see what happens... -Rob. (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  LUGNET Logo abuse on Ebay
 
An Ebay store that is using the LUGNET LOGO as their own: (URL) Mat (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
 
Hi Suz, THanks for taking the time to respond to this. I hadn't noticed that Jeremy had switched it across to .admin.general. If I had I would have moved it elsewhere. --SNIP-- (...) I'll remember that for the future. I did make sure not to spell (...) (18 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
 
(...) Is this in fact what Jeremy was refering to? (URL) know LUGNET doesn't have a list of "okay swearwords", but I'd think if stated as "BS" it'd go by unnoticed. I haven't read every post in this thread yet, just the ones which have come through (...) (18 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: IRON MECHA - image permissions
 
(...) the x-group tos issues are relevant, esp. since this is a repeat occurance. that should be addressed appropriatly and seperate from all the personal baggage surrounding this issue. I havn't noticed any sort of administration around here for (...) (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
 
(...) Mmmmm. Thanks for that blast from the past, Kev! :-) JOHN (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
 
(...) Just to be a complete compartmentalized dork about this, actually if it's an auction it should not be posted to market.bst but to market.auction, since bst specifically excludes auctions: (URL) trading post, items wanted, items for straight (...) (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general) ! 


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR