 | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? — Suzanne Rich Green
|
| | | (...) Thanks, Tim. We are aware of the problem and will restore data. -Suz (18 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Any updates worth mentioning? I ask because I'm concerned that people will be denied access to my years of profound wisdom as archived in ot.debate. Dave! (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Hrm... ok, whoops, missed otd. Restoring now, should be back soon. Let us know if any other missing areas are discovered. --Todd (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | | | | --SNIP-- (...) .trains is still missing Thanks for all the painfully tedious work it must be restoring this. Tim (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Wow! Did you have to re-type all of those messages by hand? You're amazing! However, I notice that you made a bunch of typos in reposting my messages... Thanks for restoring all of this. What a pain in the roast that must have been for you. (...) (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Why? Did the retyped ones make sense? >;-D JOHN (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) Ba-dum Dum!! Thank you folks!! John'll be playing here all week! Dave K (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) Hey, you sounded pretty good delivering that line, Dave! (not that I'm confusing you with Dave!) Let's hear you say, (URL) Johnny!"> :-D JOHN (most scared I've ever been at a movie) All work and no play makes John a dull boy. All work and no (...) (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> No TV and no beer make Homer something, something... Most scared I've been during a Simpsons Episode... :) Dave K (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Of course not--you can't make something from nothing. Dave! (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Oh, your pseudo-self deprecation is soooo transparent, Dave! JOHN (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) It's true--I only deprecate my pseudo-self. My real self remains totally undeprecated. Dave! (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Hmmm, I'm of 2 minds regarding the depiction of your undeprecated debunking. JOHN (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Honesty compels me to admit that I misread that, so that it looked as if you were questioning my underappreciated spelunking. Dave! (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Book'em, Guano! Actually, I'm in the dark on that topic. JOHN (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Sounds to me like you're totally batsh-- I mean, totally crazy. Dave! FUT: lugnet.off-topic.pus...ng-the-TOS (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) .Space is missing too. -Duane (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) .Castle and .General both look pretty sparse Ray (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) What all groups got damaged? It seems like I have to reset things in Outlook Express in the damaged groups (though maybe if I didn't reset them right after the damage, now that the restore has happened they're ok). Thanks Frank (18 years ago, 31-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) I've been muddling through ok so far... (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Baaa! Good one. Thank FSM that it was restored in time so that no permanent damage occured! JOHN (18 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) John, I had no idea that you've finally been touched by (URL) His Noodly Appendage> and seen the light! This is good news indeed. (Larritarianism is so last century, I've switched to Pastafarianism...) (18 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, since we were engaged in satire (or did we get engaged in Vegas?) I figured I should appeal to a satirical figure. His Holy Drippage seemed only right (with a dash of farsley) (...) Say it ain't so! People abandon God all the time-- how (...) (18 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Hansen
|
| | | | Last Thursday sometime after post 25482 was made to the lugnet.robotics newsgroup I posted a reply to the thread entitled Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms. It was posted as a reply to message #25475. For some reason that post does (...) (18 years ago, 31-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I see no gaps in the robotics post sequence, so it must never have made it to the server. I think even if it was awaiting authentication, it would still be assigned a post number. It may have gotten caught in the hard drive hiccup. Frank (18 years ago, 31-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
