 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
|
(...) Certainly I think they should look at it. In fact I would be surprised if they haven't already. (...) I certainly believe anything that isn't posted here or pertaining to Lugnet business should not be actionable here. But I haven't yet formed (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
|
I've been accused of taking this quote out of context. LUGNET is not a democracy. Here are all the contexts I found this quote used. Short of providing the entire text, I'll provide reasonable context. If more context is desired, I'll be happy to (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) The question was not directed at me, but I can give *my* perception of the situation. "No-one bothered to comment in public on the offense" This means that other people, reading just the groups, not having insight into private e-mails, other (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | The light touch (was Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) OK, to clarify, in your opinion, are you saying this particular clause of the ToU should not be enforced at all? Or just not in this particular case with respect to this particular post? If not at all, why not? It's really a hot button with (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) so why not here??? (...) can this be discussed now and here? please. (...) YOU guys are/were heavy handed. IMO. The other approach is the one that tony so eloquently described. LESS is more. That's a serious question. It's easy to say that the (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
