 | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) Personal speculation. I haven't the time or desire to prove my point. If anyone else deems necessary, then I'll let them count them all. I'm just saying that you get into more argumentative situations on Lugnet because of your aggressive and (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) I thought as much. Try to be more constructive. (...) I don't think recounting events here would be particularly constructive. Why don't you ask him? If he does not tell you, drop me an e-mail. (...) My point was that I have not caused a pile (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) I do not dislike you. In fact I think you have the potential to be a very great guy. What I continually notice, though, are all the negative connotations spurring from your hatred for Larry or other people who aren't "right" all the time like (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | ...your hatred for Larry...
|
| (...) For the record, I do not hate anyone; that would achieve nothing. I may dislike the things Larry does, but I do not dislike him. As I have said time-and-time again, I have a great deal of respect for Larry... I think everyone here does! I have (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: ...your hatred for Larry...
|
| (...) Thank you for weighing in, LUGNET staff conduct issues are currently being weighed by the LUGNET admins. We expect to have a draft of several new and updated documents posted for review within the next several days. The discussions over the (...) (20 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
