 | | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) I know that the admins set the rules and I know LUGNET is "non-free" in terms of the types expression allowed but I think the above opinion is very arrogant (that's not to say that you, Tim, are arrogant since I know you are not). The above (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Timeout (was Re: "Some pigs...")
|
|
(...) One year :-) -Tim (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) Then do it on a server that you own, or one that allows profanity in discussions. The only reason you would have to fear those 'seven people you haven't met' would be because those people are entrusted with the keeping of this sandbox, which (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) WILD STALLIONS RULE!!!! -Orion (who think that lately LUGNET has been severly lacking in the mirth department) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) maybe! I snipped the rest away. I think both sides have made good points and I don't want to respond point by point. Instead I want to touch on a theme. In an ideal world the only rule LUGNET would ever need would be "be excellent to each (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) Calum I am sure you knew this would be coming as soon as you listed names of people that make a point without profanity..... but here it is anyway. (...) Yes, *SOME* would say that..... (...) BUT *I* would say.... I can see your point, and I (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Timeout (was Re: "Some pigs...")
|
|
(...) You seem to be implying that answering Ondrew's email was NOT a Lugnet (admin) issue, or was less important than other issues Lar (and other admins) may have been addressing. If that is indeed what you mean, then I would strongly disagree. (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apologies (was Re: Timeout
|
|
(...) THANK YOU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Timeout (was Re: "Some pigs...")
|
|
(...) tim isin't a member anymore and hasn't been involved for close to 2 years. (...) then ask them! niltc@niltc.org the only reason they haven't replyed to this allready is because they are tired of all of the ranting and other B.S. that goes on (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) Calum, You make some excellent points. I can even see that wishy-washy-easily-swayed Dave K says that you are right. BUT, Calum, you made my point in your very last sentence. At no point have I ever(STRESS EVER) advocated that I want to swear (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
