 | | Re: "fired"?
|
| (...) I was directly involved in the Maersk debate with Mr. Nagel, including a post where he accused his employer of lying to the public: (URL) That was the first thing that came to mind when I started reading this thread. At the time, had I known (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: "fired"?
|
| (...) And the point is? I take back nothing that was said. (...) I wasn't trying to keep it a secret however it wasn't up to a Lugnet administrator to violate the TOU and raise it up the flag pole. (...) Having you feel sorry for me is so far down (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: "fired"?
|
| (...) Ken, I don't expect you to, and I do respect that you have your own personal opinions about Lego even if I don't always agree with them. But the point here is that other individuals have participated (speaking as themselves) in Lugnet while (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: "fired"?
|
| (...) This seems a bit misplaced... How did Larry violate the TOU? By bringing up your employment? By correcting the library's wording? By saying that he didn't think you were the one responsible for the wording? For a few grammar and spelling (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: "fired"?
|
| (...) All I know is what I ws told. I said I didn't mention anythiing that wasn't public knowledge and the reply was "That doesn't matter" Ken (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: "fired"?
|
| (...) Technically, the "no baiting/no bickering" policy isn't new, it's been in place for a while, and we treat it as part of the ToS although we acknowledge that the TOU document should be revised to include that material. (...) Bingo. That was (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: "fired"?
|
| (...) I've addressed this complete with quotes from Lugnet polocies and updates. It's not a debate. Ken (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: "fired"?
|
| (...) Yes it is, for I didn't see a violation and, again my interpretation, you mis-applying the TOS does not make it right, so it is up for a debate. But again, that's just my stance. Further, in my opinion, you seem to be very selective as to what (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: "fired"?
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys wrote: Snipped unnecessary post (...) If your looking for a fight head back to one of the debate forums. Ken (19 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
