 | | Re: posting privileges to 1000steine-members revoked!?
|
|
(...) I can see how there might be some confusion about this. Remember we do not censor posts. Nor do we control who can or cannot highlight (evince the fact that your post that I am replying to seems to have, at a time that people say they want (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) There's a little trick I use a lot to weed out duplicates: If the article being examined is in a group that's not the first one listed in the Newsgroups: header, then ignore that article, because it'll be examined in another directory. I'm (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) That's correct - each newsgroup is stored in a seperate file, so a single message posted to multiple newsgroups will have multiple copies, and will be counted multiple times. On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 12:38:08AM +0000, Rob Hendrix wrote: (...) I (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) Yikes! No one has ever called me wry or witty. :) I have been called Canadian before though. Calum (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
In lugnet.people, Dan Boger wrote: I can post last year's as well. <snip> That would be great, Dan. I was searching for it but couldn't find it. I am curious, because I have a feeling that the overall post count was lower in 2004. I think I posted (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) Maybe it counts the cross-post as separate messages in the count. So one post in 3 newsgroups could actually counts as 3 post. jt (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) I was disapointed to see that I was in the top 100 (just barely) I really need to spend more time building and less time posting. I'll do better next year :) jt (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) Heh, 231... That puts me up in the top 50. Yay! How do you get this information? (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) Well slap my a$$ and call me Charlie. :] I just did the same search "Kyle D. Jackson", and found 116 posts authored by me in 2004. I didn't think I had that many. Wow. :] Anyhow, that 116 is still a big miss from the 177 in the stats list. (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) Well I just did a quick search[1] and counted over 120 in the last 12 months, and that search may well have missed some. Those stats mount up quickly if you're not careful ;) ROSCO [1] Just searched all posts for "kyle d jackson" (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) Dude, these statistics are whacked. There's no way I posted 177 messages in 2004, since I only crawled back to LUGNET part way through 2004, and don't post often. How are these stats generated? KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203 (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) w00t, moved up the list a bit (a lot) I'd be by the highest UK AFO if it wasn't for Scott Aurther and his OT posts! (next is Mark Bellis with 183) Thanks for doung that dan Tim PS Do you realise that as Amando Pin only seems to post to anounce (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | posting privileges to 1000steine-members revoked!?
|
|
Larry, I have a real lack of understanding for your behaviour to revoke posting privileges to people who only quoted "bad words" to keep the context, while the original post with those "bad words" is still public and even highlighted. You know that (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) Woo hoo! I beat Lenny by 2! Take that, Kracky! (Shakes fist at Calum) Dang you, Calum, with your wry Canadian wit, I'll get you next year. (...) I did a bit of digging: (URL) top noisemakers of 2000> (URL) top noisemakers of 2001> (URL) top (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
|
|
(...) I know which ones you mean too. But I'll say that I personally don't like the milder ones either, I think they show lack of imagination. I am in the minority on the Admin team, so A-- gets a pass and B---- seems to fit the sitch, and S--- gets (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) More of a time issue - only wanted to spend a few minutes on it, and writing code that decides if two different email addresses are actually the same person was not worth the effort, imo. And in this particular case, my opinion was the one (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) c/is still the loudest mouth/still seems to have the most to say/ Tis possible to post less and still be a bigger loudmouth. This could be an E2L thing I guess. (...) Sounds like a coding problem on your end. :) (...) Was this posted there (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) 483rd :-( From top 100 to 483rd in two years. Mostly because I'm too busy these days. Must get back into it. (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) You could say he "schooled" you [1] (...) Here is exactly what I was talking about elsewhere-- we have Daves talking about Daves. It's too much for the sensibilities:-) JOHN FU to .people; I venture not into .OT [1] Schule in German = school (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
