To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12040 (-10)
  Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
 
(...) oh Bink I thought I left a hint for you there. Hit me up on AIM when you get a chance - I will let you know there. M *punches this back to plain textt* (20 years ago, 3-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
 
(...) Not sure I see exactly what you're getting at, Mark... could you elaborate where you think there's a specific problem? Thanks, Kelly (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
 
(...) Looks to me as they have a chance to prove you right -- right at this very moment. Did not take long in this 'new year' did it? Shall we sit back and see what, if anything happens? M (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
 
(...) Maybe. But then abuse of the system would lead to time-outs, would it not? If the admins start to see the page leading to too much abuse, I guess maybe then would be a good time to look at removing it. (...) I don't think this is a question of (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
 
(...) My entrie (first) post was about weighting and spotlighting. Nothing in the post was outside of that context, so there was no need to assume there was any more, or different, meaning to it. And no, I did not mean I wanted to see more of any (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
 
(...) I would think that making the weightings available to the public would lead to temptation to abuse the system. IMO. For all I know, though, the entire LUGNET community is 100% Grade A honest. Anyway, my 2. -Vince (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
 
(...) I don't know. Good question. I think you could argue that both ways, but probably it's a good idea. (...) Putting some regularization into the process seems a good idea to me, so ya, there should be. Up till now it has been ad hoc though, I (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
 
(...) A couple of questions: Will these weightings be made available on a page somewhere so everyone can see them anytime? Is there a policy in place to regularly look at these weightings and make adjustments if deemed necessary? Thanks ROSCO (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
 
(...) Mark, I wish you (and others) wouldn't go deleting quotes included for context. I've re-inserted the sentence you removed above, with I assumed to mean you wanted to see posts in .lego and .color, which is the context in which I posted my (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
 
(...) Well ya, thats kinda easy to figure out ;) I never said anything about how this was stopping that process. I know its not, I also know that is not what my post was about in any way. (...) This is kinda more on my point - but still not 100%. (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR