|
|
 | | Re: duplicate post
|
| (...) Ask an admin via email to have it cancelled. Please include the (web interface) URL of the post in question that needs cancellation in your note. You must be the author of the post and your note should make that easily verifiable for best (...) (20 years ago, 8-Nov-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) It is part of the mocking in that post, yes. (...) I don't view it that way. Not all sarcasm is mocking. (...) I don't feel the original FUT was wrong. Admonitions (which my post was, although poorly structured) belong in the original group (...) (20 years ago, 7-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) -snip- (...) But you said in (URL) that sarcasm didn't really have a place. (...) Noted. (...) Do you consider the part where I used almost your exact words in response to your post the part which is mocking? If so, how was your post not a (...) (20 years ago, 7-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | BrickLink set inventories -> LUGNET ?
|
| I know I remember seeing BrickLink set inventories being posted to Database / Set Inventories in the past, but I don't see any being posted there for quite a while. In fact, the last one that I see is dated 11-Apr-03. Is something broken or did this (...) (20 years ago, 7-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we help?
|
| What follows are my personal views, not official statements of position but I'm willing to wager that they are close enough as not to make much of a difference. (...) This post by you: (URL) was not, in my view, "mocking someone", nor did I say it (...) (20 years ago, 5-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: SPAM and OT messages
|
| <Snip> (...) </Snip> Mr. S, Thank you for your insightful and thoughtful post. As far as I can tell, the only person who is overreacting here is you. As you can very well read, you may have noticed that I did, infact, forward these concerns to the (...) (20 years ago, 3-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) You see it as a mock of someone. I see it as a mock of an outrageous claim. (...) Mocks of some people are acceptable, though perhaps not appropriate, outside the administrative area. (...) And yet, Larry, you mocked me... -snip- (...) One (...) (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) Possibly. But by no means necessarily. In my view, sometimes the way a point is made contributes to the understanding of the point being made. (...) But your condescending reprimand to me contained both sarcasm and mockery, right? And I note (...) (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: SPAM and OT messages
|
| (...) It is certainly true that there is a considerable level of effort required to ensure an open access mailing list is free of spam. (...) I didn't see any complaints about the specific messages. I saw a question as to why there is a linkage (...) (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) Hi! (...) Exactly why getting the FUT right is very helpful to the goal of keeping things well compartmentalized. (...) That's certainly not the intent, nor is it my perception. However if you could provide a few cites where you feel that's (...) (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
