|
|
 | | Re: Occasionally...
|
| (...) No, it probably is not related unless I am mistaken. (...) There are a number of reasons for a " 0 not accepted" message. If there's an error message along with it, read it, and fix (the most common message is that you have included a group (...) (20 years ago, 29-May-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Occasionally...
|
| (...) This might be related. I've been doing too much posting lately, but it me realize something. Several times I've been blocked with a "server responded with 0" "not accepted..." message that I thought meant I filled the FUT or groups field (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Occasionally...
|
| (...) Here's a link to a post by Derek R. in which, in passing, he mentions what sounds like the same or a similar issue. David K's reply also mentions what sounds like potential difficulty. (URL) (20 years ago, 27-May-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Occasionally...
|
| (...) Er... usually NOT NOT NOT a good idea. (odd number of NOTs there... means NOT a good idea!) (20 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Occasionally...
|
| (...) It's very unlikely. There is no connection that I am aware of between authentication mails (the generation and mailing of these mails is done by the server, completely automatically) getting lost in transit (or not being generated correctly) (...) (20 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
