To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 10760 (-10)
  Re: member packets (continued)
 
(...) Mark, You might be right about that...perhaps bringing out selfishness is a bit harsh, especially since there are so many of such different ages. But I also have to think that talking legal action (see (URL) )is taking it a bit far, too. I (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: member packets (continued)
 
(...) Mark, You might be right about that...perhaps bringing out selfishness is a bit harsh, especially since there are so many of such different ages. But I also have to think that talking legal action (see (URL) )is taking it a bit far, too. I (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Scheduled downtime Friday, January 31, 2003
 
(...) Update: The above upgrade was begun but not completed on Friday as planned. Downtime on Friday was on the order of 5 minutes for each of two reboots. Plan B, upgrading to a new and improved server box and transitioning everything (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: member packets (continued)
 
(...) I think you are taking it a bit too far. I also am not losing sleep over this. But does that mean others should not want it, or be concerened about it? They were given the impression they would get one - so are they wrong for wanting it? Maybe (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: member packets (continued)
 
(...) What's really sad to me is that people are so selfish about something as insignificant as this. I don't believe that of those 1000 members, all 1000 are pulling their hair out and stomping around the room with steam coming out of their ears (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: member packets (continued)
 
There is also still a large section about membership packets on that page under the "All Set?" header near the bottom. It really is sad that we have over 1000 members who are still waiting for these things. Bryan (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: member packets (continued)
 
(...) It says "To which address should we send you membership package" just below the address fields. Maybe something like: "At some time we would like to send out a membership package. If we ever do, to which address would you like us to send it?" (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: member packets
 
(...) Hi Suzanne, Todd Although I'm not really looking forward for the "membership pack" that you may or may not send (it will be cool if you did though) as much as I'm really looking forward for my membership it self ! I filled the application not (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: member packets (continued)
 
...And besides, it seems awfully pushy to take people to task for not handing out membership cards and papers when web pages about Faith, Friends, Music, Summer Madness, TEC, Alpha, and Contact Me are promised but not delivered. "Let he among you (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: member packets (continued)
 
P.S. Please take some time to watch "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory". PL^2, T~ (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR