 | | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) I hope you don't assume that Todd (or anyone else) is 'absent' from these forums when he doesn't respond loudly, swiftly and/or directly to each of your remarks. I, for one, have been here every day - listening to your comments. (...) Then it (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) Dunno. I hope so. I was encouraged by his postings. I'm very very glad to see him saying things even when they're things I may not agree with (the LD thing) (...) Yes, I think so. People should start posting very VERY gentle reminders (with a (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) I'd be happy with .announce.moc. As you say, you get the choice with the view plain - us technic-heads have already had to get used to this with bionicle 8?/ and it's OK once you get used to it. Just means you've gotta individually check all (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GpIu2r.4zr@lugnet.com... (...) MOCs. (...) laws (...) The MOC posts in .announce continue despite Todd's word on it. Will Todd take futher action to enforce what he said? Is it (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) Yep, this was suggested elsewhere in the thread and it has a lot of merit. My preference would be for build.announce as that keeps the announce tree low traffic. (yes, you could view .announce without subgroups but then you miss (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
