 | | Re: Come On!
|
|
(...) Ignore this if it is at all confusing... but if you use the web interface that should be OK, you can post to several groups and set FUT to more than one but less than all of them. Not sure about Outlook Express or how it works so that could be (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: posting varification, ug!
|
|
(...) but if you're a member, and you're posting via the web, LUGNET already knows who you are... no need for pgp there... unless you mean as a way to post without being logged in? (...) heh, why make users choose? if you're a member, you _can_ (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: posting varification, ug!
|
|
(...) Yep. I guess the question I have is, to what extent can they be tied into the various interfaces? For NNTP and email, I'd imagine they're fairly easy. For web, it'd be more difficult I assume. (...) I guess my inclination (in a perfect world) (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: posting varification, ug!
|
|
(...) nod - that does make sense. I know Jennifer and I still don't use the web interface, but we're special :) (...) since anyone can become a member, if a malicious user wanted to spoof Suz, for instance, all he had to do is fork out $10... (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: posting varification, ug!
|
|
(...) I'm willing to bet that the distribution of posting has shifted toward the Web interface since the authentication has gone into effect. At least among LUGNET *members*. (...) If members are spoofing posts, there's a real problem. I'd think (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickbay subgroup again
|
|
Any progress on a decision about lugnet.market.brickshops? I noticed that recently a few experienced members have advertised their shops in lugnet.market.shopping. The shopping subgroup doesn't specifically exclude this. I have gotten used to the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Come On!
|
|
I figured it out. I had more than one group in the follow up to space. -- Nicole widow of Kenneth A. Drumm Ph.D. "Kenneth A. Drumm Ph.D." <arcanamachi@netzero.net> wrote in message news:GHyoAH.14z@lugnet.com... (...) list (...) 0x800CCCA9 (...) (...) (25 years ago, 12-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Come On!
|
|
Every thing is correct just like you have here. All I do is click on a list of subscribed groups. -- Nicole widow of Kenneth A. Drumm Ph.D. "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:200108121448.f7...ron.com... (...) exist.', (...) prefix? (...) (25 years ago, 12-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Come On!
|
|
(...) It seems the server claims you were posting to bad groups. I assume you had '.'s in your groups when you posted? and had a 'lugnet.' prefix? 'lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.ny.bin, lugnet.org.us.luncy'... also, notice that the (...) (25 years ago, 12-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Come On!
|
|
Now when trying to post we get this: Outlook Express could not post your message. Subject 'New website', Account: 'lugnet.com', Server: 'lugnet.com', Protocol: NNTP, Server Response: '441 Your message is addressed to a group which does not exist.', (...) (25 years ago, 12-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
