 | | Re: Selecting top stories
|
|
(...) They might very much dislike the earlier post, and they'd give it a very low rating. Maybe they discovered a typo that they couldn't resist pouncing on. Maybe they like to type a lot. Steve (26 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Selecting top stories
|
|
(...) Then why did they bother to reply? (...) I'd do it, except that I read LUGnet with a newsreader. I started hacking rating support into slrn, but then I got distracted. (26 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Growth
|
|
(...) Todd Lehman. :) (26 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Selecting top stories
|
|
(...) I think that's a great idea.... in the web interface, add the vote pulldown menu to it, so you can vote with the same "POST" request... for email and NNTP (which currently can't vote, and can't even see the votes), allow either a custom header (...) (26 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Selecting top stories
|
|
(...) I've noticed that most messages get very few ratings. But I'm not sure that counting followups can replace ratings, because someone posting a response to a message doesn't indicate that they feel the message is important or newsworthy. (...) (26 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
