To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / *4810 (-10)
  Re: Gods Monopoly
 
(...) This came up once before. Inasmuch as off-topic threads flare up from time to time and clog the overall stream of messages for a few hours, they _are_ part of the community, and to hide them from the top level of the group hierarchy would be (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
 
(...) Is it me, or is there an inordinately large number of people complaining about on-topic discussion in the .off-topic.* groups today? There certainly might be *some* confusion when a newcomer sees four non-Lego messages on the front page. But (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
 
(...) We never left it. Fridays are (IIRC) typically slow days for traffic on Lugnet, for a bunch of reasons. Today, that low volume is combined with a fast-paced debate (not the first, won't be the last), so it looks a bit weird on the stats, but (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
 
  Reminder: the .off-topic.* groups ARE for off-topic topics
 
(...) As far as I'm aware, all of the religious debate messages are all properly placed in the .off-topic.debate group (with a couple spinoff sub-threads in the .admin.general group)... Just set your newsreader not to download the .off-topic.debate (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
 
(...) I don't want you to either. I was speaking against the requests, not against you doing it. I happen to like your stance on that issue. Ben Roller (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
 
I have told many people about lugnet, and what a great site for lego content, but the volumes of messages the last few days contradict that. When will we be returned to our regularly scheduled programming? (...) if (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
 
(...) I don't want to make judgment calls like that. If Erin wants her post cancelled, and she asks specifically for it to be cancelled (by group name and article number, or by Message-ID), then I'll cancel it. Maybe she makes a good decision, maybe (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Gods Monopoly
 
(...) Me too. The more I think about the potentials, the more I go "wow!" (...) So long as you don't use "space boots" in the same sentence, you're fine. :) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
 
(...) Arrr, as us piratical types be saying, the cat's out o' the bag. :-) Bruce (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
 
(...) I am strongly against people deleting messages when it turns out that they were wrong. Just because you don't believe it anymore is no reason to pretend that you never said it. The follow up messages are enough, at least for me, to show that (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR