 | | Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
|
|
I have told many people about lugnet, and what a great site for lego content, but the volumes of messages the last few days contradict that. When will we be returned to our regularly scheduled programming? (...) if (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
|
|
(...) I don't want to make judgment calls like that. If Erin wants her post cancelled, and she asks specifically for it to be cancelled (by group name and article number, or by Message-ID), then I'll cancel it. Maybe she makes a good decision, maybe (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Gods Monopoly
|
|
(...) Me too. The more I think about the potentials, the more I go "wow!" (...) So long as you don't use "space boots" in the same sentence, you're fine. :) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
|
|
(...) Arrr, as us piratical types be saying, the cat's out o' the bag. :-) Bruce (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
|
|
(...) I am strongly against people deleting messages when it turns out that they were wrong. Just because you don't believe it anymore is no reason to pretend that you never said it. The follow up messages are enough, at least for me, to show that (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
|
|
(...) I can't know exactly which message you mean (I can guess) without a group and message number, but if you can point precisely to it (send me an email) I can cancel it upon your request. However, I can't (won't) cancel other peoples' replies (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Gods Monopoly
|
|
(...) Yes. I often encounter frustration with this sometimes when perusing lugnet.cad.dat.models , and seeing more messages for lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets . I chalked it up to something that can be fixed later, however; there are other features I (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Gods Monopoly
|
|
(...) Ah, I just had an insight to what the problem is. I bet some of the people who are complaining read Lugnet from the main page, which consolidates all the newsgroups. Perhaps the top page should not consolidate the off-topic hierarchy (I'd also (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Heehee! (was:Re: Town on wheels (was Re: Millennium City))
|
|
(...) Yes! That's exactly the type of quote! Good call! :) :) :) --Todd (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 4x2ReVu: 4950 Loader Dozer
|
|
(...) Agreement here, also. I've only heard it used defensively / aggressively, as if the person saying is were too insecure to mention the "-sexual" part of "homosexual". And in the context of Nan Zhou's stark message, I'd guess that the only (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
