| |
Rick Kujawa wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Todd
> Lehman writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Rick Kujawa writes:
> > > I dunno/don't care. He apparently does have a monopoly on LUGNET at the
> > > moment. Someone please wake me when it gets back to Lego topics.
> >
> > Rick:
> > The .off-topic.* groups (_especially_ .off-topic.debate) are specifically
> > for non-LEGO topics. It's perfectly OK for people to be discussing non-LEGO
> > stuff here in .off-topic.debate.
> >
> > --Todd
>
> I know its OK. I was just growing
> tired of it dominating Lugnet. I'm
> sure it will get back to normal
> soon.
Ah, I just had an insight to what the problem is. I bet some of the
people who are complaining read Lugnet from the main page, which
consolidates all the newsgroups.
Perhaps the top page should not consolidate the off-topic hierarchy (I'd
also suggest it not consolidate the admin hierarchy if this comes into
play).
Now I see why you are looking at this channel stuff, that would allow
people to create a top page which consolidates the areas of interest,
and overcome the fact that the lugnet hierarchy can never be perfect.
follow-ups to lugnet.admin.general
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
