 | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images)
|
|
James Brown <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote in article <FqB4M3.KH4@lugnet.com>... (...) suggesting (...) be (...) become (...) to (...) still (...) I've (...) easy (...) blatantly, (...) job, (...) Well, using that logic, if the best person (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New group suggestion
|
|
(...) That's a good point. Where I was going with this is that by encouraging people to post when and where they find old sets or significantly discounted sets it would make it easier for others to find the same. However, I think the above example (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Can this possibly be worth the opening amount ?
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) have (...) whole (...) True, of course to some extent, I was just pulling your leg. It does point out though that many posts operate on several layers, and it can be hard to pick the best group for the post. I (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Can this possibly be worth the opening amount ?
|
|
(...) I dunno...depends on what (if any) other stuff comes up. Discussion of extra details of the auction (the "information holes" I was referring to), I'd put those in .auction. Discussion of whether to sell a collection whole or in parts, I'd put (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Can this possibly be worth the opening amount ?
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) depend (...) selling (...) work (...) Hmm, per recent discussion on guidelines, wouldn't lugnet.market.theory have been better? Thinking more on the lines of where market discussions should happen, someone who (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
