Subject:
|
Re: Can this possibly be worth the opening amount ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 02:09:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
136 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz writes:
> > > [followups to lugnet.market.auction!]
> >
> > Hmm, per recent discussion on guidelines, wouldn't lugnet.market.theory • have
> > been better?
>
> I dunno...depends on what (if any) other stuff comes up. Discussion of
> extra details of the auction (the "information holes" I was referring to),
> I'd put those in .auction. Discussion of whether to sell a collection
whole
> or in parts, I'd put that in .theory.
True, of course to some extent, I was just pulling your leg. It does point
out though that many posts operate on several layers, and it can be hard to
pick the best group for the post. I would say that we should err on the side
of leniency in dealing with these types of things (though a note "That would
have been better placed in group xyz" might be in order).
> I would also have put the original post in .auction, not .general.
Good point.
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Can this possibly be worth the opening amount ?
|
| (...) I dunno...depends on what (if any) other stuff comes up. Discussion of extra details of the auction (the "information holes" I was referring to), I'd put those in .auction. Discussion of whether to sell a collection whole or in parts, I'd put (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
