 | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) I'm surprised the mockers are so mysterious to you. Don't they have their own (URL) staging area> and everything? *shrug* -Tim (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) I agree with Jake and Lenny. Conversely to Jake's statement, I think that people do think less of you when you don't allow change to happen by holding onto the reigns and not encouraging people who are willing to lead and empowering them by (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Warnings
|
| (...) My expectation is that they're considered, but not as meaningful as admin warnings. If Howard was warned 50 times by other members, and once by an admin, but Harold was only ever warned once by an admin for the same violations; it seems that (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
| (...) In my experience, mod/admin decisions should be made based on official warnings rather than peer recommendations, which may be biased or incomplete. For instance, having 5 people say "Don't do that" about something is not as effective as a (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
| (...) Actually, that raises another question. Should admins disregard advice/warnings given by others (non-admins and admins in non-admin role) in making decisions about timeouts/bans? Seems to me they should count for something, though exactly how (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
