 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) That's definitely the preferred method; in fact, I had some problems sending and receiving using my LUGNET admin email address, but those have been straightened out. While it's preferred, I don't believe that it's absolutely required, but (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Well to be pedantic, there were 2 statements in your sentence, Kevin's response could have been referring to either (or both). (...) Which brings up another point - do official mails come from the @lugnet.com addresses, or from your private (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Certainly I think they should look at it. In fact I would be surprised if they haven't already. (...) I certainly believe anything that isn't posted here or pertaining to Lugnet business should not be actionable here. But I haven't yet formed (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
| I've been accused of taking this quote out of context. LUGNET is not a democracy. Here are all the contexts I found this quote used. Short of providing the entire text, I'll provide reasonable context. If more context is desired, I'll be happy to (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) The question was not directed at me, but I can give *my* perception of the situation. "No-one bothered to comment in public on the offense" This means that other people, reading just the groups, not having insight into private e-mails, other (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
