 | | LUGNET members association
|
| I move to form a new organization (not led by myself), that consists of members (if you aren't a member of LUGNET, what's the holdup?) of the LUGNET community. The association would govern the majority of the members needs, desires, problems, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions) !
| | | | | Re: P&P document
|
| (...) Unfortunately, it's an option, albeit one that I don't think anyone likes. There have been many posts recently about lack of trust in the administration of LUGNET, with some justification. But it works both ways. Admins need to be able to (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) You bring up some good and valid points, especially regarding perception of opacity. It's a real issue, and it's something we're trying to improve on. In this specific example (the LPRV committee and process documentation), I do think there's (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: P&P document
|
| Whoa! NDA's !? You're kidding right !? This is just getting bizarre... This is exactly the kind of thing that is souring people. This just feels heavy-handed and dictatorial. No matter the reason, this is a bad idea. It smells rotten to say that (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote: <snip lotsa goodstuff> (...) The first step, in my humble opinion, isn't accuracy, it's transparency. We're not in Kindergarten, where the teacher has to set everything up 'behind the scenes' and then (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
