 | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) I agree that people not highlighting isn't necessarily a bad thing, UNLESS those people then complain about what shows up in the spotlight. Instead of encouraging those dissatisfied people to highlight more often, the admins rejiggered the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) That's not really actionable, sorry. At least not for me anyway. (...) Great suggestions. However, they weren't clear to me, no... That is, they didn't jump out at me AS SUGGESTIONS at all. I've asked that posts that should be tracked as (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) I agree! IF everyone that cared about what hits the spotlight list consistently highlighted (or didn't highlight) things, you would be absolutely correct. (...) Right... We don't. BECAUSE, based on user comments, which we listen to carefully, (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) Thanks, Marc. That helps my understanding of the current scheme ... Shaun (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) Again - in my opinion - yes. Lugnet has already been besieged by some serious challenges in the past 18 months, most of which were natural and forseeable consequences of a community that loved its small-village feel enough that it did (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) Actually, having the spotlight feature honor the skip filter would resolve the highlighting issue, but unfortunately that won't happen. -Duane (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) snip You can get the justification for the Spotlight weights (URL) here> and (URL) here>. This bit strikes me as particularly absurd: These can be tweaked as necessary. And will be, if we can't get spotlighting to highlight what we believe (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) Seriously jeopardised? (...) It's not the only thing that matters, no, but posts to .announce.* and in particular, posts to announce.moc get an upweighting, and posts to .admin.* and .off-topic.* get a downweighting. That was spoecifically in (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| Frustrated Comments Ahead: Is there any summary information available to try and understand how some of the major AFOL resources are now being administered? Both Lugnet and Brickshelf seem to have undergone major practical changes in the last few (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX) !!
|
|
