Subject:
|
Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:22:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
542 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Shaun Sullivan wrote:
|
|
Ive set the FUT on my post (and forcefut your posts FUT) to just
admin.general. In particular was there a specific suggestion that you were
making? If there was and I missed it, please feel free to drop me (or any
admin) a mail, or reply with FUT set back to .suggeestions, so I know to add
the specific suggestion to the list.
|
My specific suggestion is to read my post, evaluate whether theres any
information that may be useful to you (i.e. the administrators) or the
community, and if so run with it.
|
Thats not really actionable, sorry. At least not for me anyway.
|
Alternatively I could say:
I recommend disallowing any non-peer-reviewed posts from the spotlight
column.
and
I recommend a detailed revision page to document changes to the site
functionality and/or administration.
both of which are formalized expressions of some wishlist items that I
believe were pretty clear from the original post.
|
Great suggestions. However, they werent clear to me, no...
That is, they didnt jump out at me AS SUGGESTIONS at all. Ive asked that posts
that should be tracked as suggestions be clearly posted as suggestions (not a
general thing that one has to infer suggestions from), one per post, in order to
get them onto the list. But thats a new development and one that not every
general browser would know, so no worries there.
|
If not I apologize, but
theres still some inherent value to raising questions or concerns without
the constraints of presupposed solutions.
|
Suggestions dont necessarily contain solutions, do they? Many of the best
suggestions are about how one wishes things would work without any specific
technical grounding.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|