To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / *12241 (-10)
  Re: LUGENT Traffic?
 
(...) In the past it sometimes but not always been indicative of a lot of spiders and webcrawlers scanning the site... hmm... you by any chance haven't had anything to do with making LUGNET more attractive to SPIDERS lately, have you Duane??? ((URL) (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  LUGENT Traffic?
 
I've been getting this message quite often in the last week or so: Server temporarily unavailable due to heavy load. Please try again in a few minutes. Is the site getting more hits than normal, or is this indicative of another problem? -Duane (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: Problems with Lugnet and Peeron
 
(...) That's actually normat - most likely the machine at #11 doesn't reply to ICMP packets - usually firewalls/routers. Since it's the last jump before the server, I think a firewall there is very likely. (...) I wonder if it's a DNS issue - if you (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: Timeout (was Re: "Some pigs...")
 
(...) That's true, Ondrew, the large amount of time that LUGNET has required from the admin team lately is not your problem. Unfortunately, when issues that have been dealt with (as this one has been) are reopened with repeats of insinuations and (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Effeet insults 101 was (Re: who does chris think he is?)
 
(...) As do many people, but what most, while doing so, don't realize is that they are on some level arguing for or against something. Whether the argument is with the 2 $^#$%$#^ bricks that won't separate or the @#$^& thing you dislike (for (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Effeet insults 101 was (Re: who does chris think he is?)
 
(...) Who said anything about argument? I often use words in normal conversation that would probably be considered profane here. ROSCO (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: who does chris think he is?
 
(...) No, but I would expect you'd do something like this, so...carry on! :) (...) For THAT matter, I could also say Emimem or NWA made some excellent points using a LOT of profanity. What I'm trying to get across is, for the subject matter, that (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: who does chris think he is?
 
(...) And what I'm saying is, you don't NEED to. It's like saying, should I ever NEED to blow up a small sovereign nation, I want to always have access to a nuclear weapon (since everyone likes to call it the "F-Bomb" (?!#!@#)). It should never get (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR