 | | Re: Timeout (was Re: "Some pigs...")
|
| (...) That's true, Ondrew, the large amount of time that LUGNET has required from the admin team lately is not your problem. Unfortunately, when issues that have been dealt with (as this one has been) are reopened with repeats of insinuations and (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Effeet insults 101 was (Re: who does chris think he is?)
|
| (...) As do many people, but what most, while doing so, don't realize is that they are on some level arguing for or against something. Whether the argument is with the 2 $^#$%$#^ bricks that won't separate or the @#$^& thing you dislike (for (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Effeet insults 101 was (Re: who does chris think he is?)
|
| (...) Who said anything about argument? I often use words in normal conversation that would probably be considered profane here. ROSCO (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
| (...) No, but I would expect you'd do something like this, so...carry on! :) (...) For THAT matter, I could also say Emimem or NWA made some excellent points using a LOT of profanity. What I'm trying to get across is, for the subject matter, that (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
| (...) And what I'm saying is, you don't NEED to. It's like saying, should I ever NEED to blow up a small sovereign nation, I want to always have access to a nuclear weapon (since everyone likes to call it the "F-Bomb" (?!#!@#)). It should never get (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
