To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / *11726 (-10)
  Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
 
(...) I've been thinking that it might be very useful if LUGNET had a mode (in the web interface) where only the first message in each thread were displayed. This would make it much easier for people to ignore the topics that they don't wish to read (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
 
(...) I think I speak for all of us when I say... If we had seen this when only Randall had posted, that's where we would have started trying to guide to the right place. It was too late for that when I first saw it though. But I agree, his post was (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
 
(...) I agree, I just think that the LUGNET admins were jumping all over the respondants and not so much to Randall. "Taking names" and "check your attitude at the door" and such comments seemed to be fairly aimed at us who wanted to defend the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
 
(...) You make a good point, Alfred. Personally, I think Randall's original message to lugnet.general was misplaced -- although I believe he was probably trying to reach people in lugnet.general specifically since that's where so much vitriol had (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Contributer Agreement v2
 
[Trimmed .cad.dev.org.ldraw, we're way off topic for that group] So, could there be an option on the web-interface for this? Like a checkbox for "start a new thread with message"? Then the web interface could automatically add some kind of X-header (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
 
(...) Hi Terry, I'm still upset about it too. (...) Randall is probably as upset about hearing complaints from people like us as we are about the color change. The best thing we can do to honor requests from Randall and others is to talk about it in (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.color) ! 
 
  Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
 
(...) I've got it. How about .ranting? I'm kidding. Steven Weiser (22 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
 
(...) The most appropriate place for this question is lugnet.admin.general, to which I've set followups, but to answer your quesiton: Appropriate posts to lugnet.general are posts for which there is no more logical group that applies. In rare cases, (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.color, lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: Contributer Agreement v2
 
(...) Thanks! Maybe even crosslink, with the first post in the continued tree pointing (with an explicit label) back to the root of the previous tree too. (...) Yes! (22 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Contributer Agreement v2
 
(...) Very good idea! (...) And it helps future readers when the linkage is spelled out explicitly. Steve (22 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR