 | | Who is in charge of what? (not a curator question)
|
|
Is there a page, list or anything that will tell us who is in charge of the different aspects of Lugnet, and what they can do? I know Todd has been looking to delegate some duties here, and I have no idea if he has or has not, and if he has then to (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Changing Email Addresses
|
|
(...) Hey Kevin, Thanks for the note--and no, I hadn't tried that, because of precisely what you mentioned. I had expected that there would be another way to do it but apparently there isn't! I must think over this. best LFB (23 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) I think it would be instructive for you and everyone else that is concerned about this matter (all 3 of you :-) ) to review Todd's original (URL) post> especially the last sentence: "However, in the process I expect you in turn to respect the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) wisdom? (...) You know, I've been wondering the same thing for about 2 weeks now. He must be on Ridilin or something... I have never seen such straight, to the point, and tactful posts from him before! I had always assumed he was one of the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) Hear Hear! Dave K -'Tis amazing, inn't it that Scott has become the voice of rationale and wisdom? :) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
I'm disappointed that MC's constructive post has been used as and excuse for axe grinding by the usual suspects. Scott A (23 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) Why must the painfully obvious constantly be pointed out to you? A. Because this is the only newsgroup I can currently reply to. B. Because it *IS* an administrative matter. But while we are here... Why the devil does it matter to you or Lar? (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Marchetti wrote: (snip) (...) "Letter of the TOS"? Really. Tell me how exactly your post is anywhere near on topic for .admin. Grow up. JOHN (23 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) I completely agree he was rabble rousing and fully aware of it. Also arguably as egregious with its "in your face" attitude was his flaunting the fact that he was posting with a dead email address and not providing a good one. But I saw no (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) That's pretty funny coming from you, Lar. You are absolutely the biggest baby in this sandbox and I think everyone knows that fact -- you have stated as much to me via private emails in the past. Sadly, neither this site nor real life is a (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
