 | | Re: traffic page changes?
|
|
(...) (URL) it's a rilly old page. (...) Prolly here: (URL) but I assumed it was a forgotten code relic from LUGNET's early days; Yup! (...) The reason I didn't upgrade it the other day is because I've got a new header module in the works that does (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: traffic page changes? (a 2nd error to report)
|
|
Same probelm with o-t.clone-brands Also, you may want this info, I am running IE 6.0.2 with 1024 X 768 Screen Resolution. and don't listen to the old-timers, the new page is great! :-) Jeremy (...) (23 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: traffic page changes?
|
|
(...) "Me Too" Scott A (23 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: traffic page changes? (a 2nd error to report)
|
|
(...) Or use Dan Boger's code for "squeezing" group names 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: traffic page changes? (a 2nd error to report)
|
|
I personally like the new traffic page layout. The old layout was outdated. The lugnet layout is very sterile IMHO. Anyway, I have another error report for you Todd: when traffic for the market.b-s-t forum is posted, because it line wraps, the whole (...) (23 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: traffic page changes?
|
|
(...) Has this page always had the nonstandard "newsgroup-only" search box? (URL) know I've seen it before somewhere, but I assumed it was a forgotten code relic from LUGNET's early days; I'm surprised to see it survived a reworking of the page. -- (...) (23 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: traffic page changes?
|
|
(...) OK so it wasn't an inadvertant layout change, then... what was wrong with the old layout? This one seems less polished somehow but without a side by side I can't quite put my finger on why. (23 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: traffic page changes?
|
|
(...) Sorry about that. I used ' instead of ' in a couple places. I forgot that ' is only valid in XML (as opposed to all versions of HTML) and Mozilla happened to display it correctly so I didn't even notice. Anyway thanks for reporting (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: traffic page changes?
|
|
(...) Ya, that is not the best placement for signout (except that it's a really *natural* placement for signin... and having them in different places is bad). One plus is that you get a prompt, IIRC, you don't really get signed out without a further (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: traffic page changes?
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) I've noticed that icon, but just never clicked on it--it's right beside the 'Sign-out' button--the mouse cursor never visits that upper right corner of the screen ;) But now that i know its there... Well, once in a blue moon I'll (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
