 | | Re: Suz Q&A was:[Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?]
|
| (...) Why are all these kinds posts in lugnet.lego.direct? Does anyone expect Lego Direct to comment here? (or in similar posts). Of the groups that I follow, and I only follow a few (.trains, .trains.org, .cad.mlcad, and .cad.dev.mac), this is one (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
| (...) (not Suz or Todd, but...) Steve has the right of it. I'm e-mail subscribed to loc.ca, but I do not see any messages in any of the various loc.ca.foo groups. This is IMO, a good thing. thanks, James (24 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
| (...) That's weird, I was thinking it's the exact _opposite_. (In fact, I've arranged my subscriptions based on this premise, that I need only the upper-level groups, that the lower-level groups will be included...) Suz, Todd, which way is correct? (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | message authentication
|
| Hi! After posting several messages recently, it became obvious to me that the "dreaded authentication process" was actually quite painless. Simple. Easy, in fact. The (relatively) new system with a web link in the authentication email really (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
| (...) Because 'lugnet.cad.dat' is retired, inactive, no-longer-in-existence. Unless I misunderstand news-by-mail, you only get messages for groups you specifically subscribe to, not all the subgroups under the specific groups. Steve (24 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
