 | | Re: Discount code clarification and update
|
|
(...) Oh. I thought this would be a "site by fans, for fans" as announced at the homepage. Where the users are making the content. (...) If this is your view, everone has to tolerate it, but please do tolerate other views and also speculations too. (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: patience please
|
|
(...) [...] (...) Thank you for posting this! The absense of messages like this is exactly what people meant whey they said "sitting on your hands". If it isn't obvious that you're doing anything, there is a certain temptation to assume that you're (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | patience please
|
|
Hi all, I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed by the amount of stuff I really want to reply to here.. - Right now I'm writing a summary of my opinions on the posting privileges issue, because I see people making false assumptions. I'd also like to set up a (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Biggest Thread on Lugnet?
|
|
Hi all! I have a question. Does anyone know how to access the biggest threads in post count on lugnet? I have noticed through my time on Lugnet that some really large threads developed in a matter of days on some very interesting and thought (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:GxrFKF.D3p@lugnet.com... (...) be (...) a (...) Just don't forget Suz your only human. (mini-fig) -- Thanx~ Nicole (URL) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
|
|
(...) yup. I screwed up. -Suz (24 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
|
|
(...) Actually Bill Ward is right... as an admin, Suz needs to lead by example. What she posted earlier today was in my opinion very shocking and inappropriate. I have to also look at her flaming policy as of late and "judge her by her own words"... (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
|
|
(...) banned (...) No, I attacked her conduct. As the LUGNET Admin, she should be following a higher standard. Stooping to this level was completely out of line, and deserved a strong response. Please keep this in lugnet.admin.general, where I set (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
|
|
And then you turn around and attack Suz personally, I think you should be banned also. All you really needed was your first paragraph.. Tamy (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
|
|
(...) Her post sure seems to be in violation of the rules: (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
