 | | Posting to the future......
|
|
I just posted to LUGNET.Trains and noticed it said that I posted it on Saturday June 8th at about 4:30am. And its still only Friday the 7th about 9:30pm. So I just thought I would brind this up so someone else nows about it. Dave PS I hope this is (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) While I agree with the above, PLEASE enable a return after typing to start a search - I HATE sites that have a text entry box and hitting return at that point will do nothing. On a sidenote - I use the (URL) Search, have it set to the Search (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
<snipped> This is truely an interesting subject. Can a fan related site become too professional? I feel not, because the things that make commercial sites look so much like commercial sites are the adds, the cluttered look and the flashy elements. (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Screwy email for Server
|
|
(...) OH, yeah, here is my authentication: Jude, Here is a copy of the message you posted to lugnet.robotics... --LUGNET Server ___...___ |Newsgroups: lugnet.robotics |References: <Gx6x4M.K99@lugnet.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020604....frii.com> (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Screwy email for Server
|
|
(...) That is what I don't get. I only post via the web. I do not like having to authenticate. <g> Could it be a result of the robotics mailing list? Why would a bounce have the same date/time stamp as my posted message? Jude (24 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Screwy email for Server
|
|
(...) that can't be right? if you look at the message the server bounced at you, it has an html copy of the message, etc - seems like it was an email sent to the mailing list? or am I misunderstanding here? Dan (24 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) I think it was a fine design. I was simply offering an opinion from a different point of view. I took from her original post that she was showing the mock-up in case anyone wanted to offer an opinion. I'm not sure she was actively soliciting (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
Well, I don't want to come off as overly combative on this issue but I think Suz's design was fine and absolutely heading in the right direction. Keep in mind that the screen shot she posted first was a screen shot of her whole screen (the browser, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Screwy email for Server
|
|
(...) But I did post via the web. Jude (24 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Screwy email for Server
|
|
(...) yah, proper "vacation" programs should know not to respond to "bulk" mail. Unfortunately, some of the more common implementations are not so smart. (...) that is because that mail server (I think it's exchange?) does not reply to mail (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
