 | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) There is NO reason for a rebuttal to guidance, ever, unless you think there's an issue with the guidance. The proper response to guidance, *unless you think there is an issue* is "thanks, I'll keep that in mind". Nothing else. See Shiri's post (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | RE: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) I do not think guidance is inappropriate. I think dragging guidance out to more than 1 or 2 posts to the point where it becomes a huge argument is inappropriate. (...) My reply was obviously misunderstood...I did not mean "yelling" literally. (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys writes: <snip> (...) Nope. There are at least two issues here with the original post, its followup, and the responses. It is useful to keep them separate and many in this thread have but not all. 1. Was the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) Wasn't he way ahead of his time?? (...) Few minor issues, no need to get someone's knickers in a knot over. Just maybe rethinking certain things. (...) I appreciate the work the LUGNET admins do for all of us. Just wanted to say that here. Why (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Replies to posts gone awry
|
| I've been tempted to reply to many of the threads in this post: (URL) by John Heins. John erroneously cross-posted this to market.shopping. The previous post /loc/uk/?n=7787 by Mark Calladine arguably could have been cross-posted there, but John's (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
