Subject:
|
Re: Fuzzy categories: The death of black & white
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Sun, 10 Jan 1999 01:47:08 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
beaker@pobox.com(saynotospam)
|
Viewed:
|
773 times
|
| |
|
|
Also sprach Todd Lehman:
: To be more precise, Star Wars sets are certainly "space" sets (lowercase "s"),
: but clearly not "Space" sets (uppercase "S" as in "LEGO[LAND] Space System")
: because of their non-6[89]xx numbering.
Ah, but as various 4xx, 8xx, 9xx, 21xx and 17xx sets have proven, set
numbers do not an official Space set make either ... which only goes to
show the nature of the task you have undertaken. I do not envy you ...
I have the chore of chosing which FAQ questions go where, with the
inevitable outcome being no matter what I decide, someone will hate it:)
That's quite enough ambiguity for me:)
/ _ _ / _ _ One good product deserves a knock-off.
()(-(//((-/
============= Jim Baker -- Weather Weasel Extraordinaire ==============
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Fuzzy categories: The death of black & white
|
| (...) Ah, but sometimes they do (anything in 6800-6999 :-). But I admit, it's possible that TLG may someday destroy the sacred 6800-6999 range as they destroyed the 6700-6799 range. 67xx used to be solely for Space minifigs and Space Light & Sound (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Fuzzy categories: The death of black & white
|
| (...) That's an interesting thought. :) The question, of course, was a trick question -- where the [de]capitalization of "space" is intended to illustrate the inherent controversy/confusion. To be more precise, Star Wars sets are certainly "space" (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
