|
| | Re: Some data on set 2_7
|
| (...) I don't know - there's no note on the source of that info... :/ maybe Todd or Suz remember? Dan (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | Re: Some data on set 2_7
|
| (...) Certainly an interesting question. Of course it's possible the box cover is wrong for 2_7. It's also possible there's a difference in how to count compund pieces (like wheels), though I'm not sure this set has many wheels. It's also possible (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | Re: 4.5v vs 12
|
| (...) Whichever subtree structure is chosen, the problem remains that some sets could be in more than one category (bogieplates or the train-ideabook for example), so I guess there is still need for a non-voltage specific category. If for (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | Re: 1593 box photos! (was: Re: you guys noticed this auction? - Wow!)
|
| (...) That's an interesting method of bidding - picking the maximum bid amount to be the same as the set number. Thank goodness this set wasn't numbered in the 6000's! - Bob (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | Re: 4.5v vs 12
|
| (...) hmm... i think this one's up to Todd and Suz... me, i love looking up all the 9v in one shot and finding out what sets i still need... couldn't do that here, not in one shot at least. (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |