Subject:
|
Re: 4.5v vs 12
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Mar 2001 14:49:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
168 times
|
| |
|
|
Dan Boger wrote:
>
> Frank Buiting wrote:
>
> > I'd also like the tree to look something like this:
> > Trains > Accessory Elements > 4.5v
> > Trains > Accessory Elements > 12v
> > Trains > Accessory Elements > 9v
>
> I think this is a very good idea - I was always bothered by the fact
> that when I'm looking for an accessory pack, I may have to look in three
> subgroups instead of one...
hmm... i think this one's up to Todd and Suz... me, i love looking up
all the 9v in one shot and finding out what sets i still need...
couldn't do that here, not in one shot at least.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 4.5v vs 12
|
| (...) Whichever subtree structure is chosen, the problem remains that some sets could be in more than one category (bogieplates or the train-ideabook for example), so I guess there is still need for a non-voltage specific category. If for (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 4.5v vs 12
|
| (...) I think this is a very good idea - I was always bothered by the fact that when I'm looking for an accessory pack, I may have to look in three subgroups instead of one... :) Dan (23 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
