Subject:
|
Re: 4.5v vs 12
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:11:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1389 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, Jennifer L. Boger writes:
> Dan Boger wrote:
> >
> > Frank Buiting wrote:
> >
> > > I'd also like the tree to look something like this:
> > > Trains > Accessory Elements > 4.5v
> > > Trains > Accessory Elements > 12v
> > > Trains > Accessory Elements > 9v
> >
> > I think this is a very good idea - I was always bothered by the fact
> > that when I'm looking for an accessory pack, I may have to look in three
> > subgroups instead of one...
>
> hmm... i think this one's up to Todd and Suz... me, i love looking up
> all the 9v in one shot and finding out what sets i still need...
> couldn't do that here, not in one shot at least.
Whichever subtree structure is chosen, the problem remains that some sets
could be in more than one category (bogieplates or the train-ideabook for
example), so I guess there is still need for a non-voltage specific
category. If for <category><voltage> structure is chosen, those items could
be put in the <category> group. If <voltage><category> is the preferred
structure, a new subgroup for the <voltage> could be useful I think.
-Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 4.5v vs 12
|
| (...) hmm... i think this one's up to Todd and Suz... me, i love looking up all the 9v in one shot and finding out what sets i still need... couldn't do that here, not in one shot at least. (26 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
