Subject:
|
Re: Some data on set 2_7
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Mar 2001 17:23:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1182 times
|
| |
|
|
Frank Filz wrote:
> > Ok, so I'll fix the 2_7 - but does that mean that 105 has 184 pieces too?
>
>
> Certainly an interesting question. Of course it's possible the box cover
> is wrong for 2_7. It's also possible there's a difference in how to
> count compund pieces (like wheels), though I'm not sure this set has
> many wheels. It's also possible that set 105 just happens to use the
> same cover art. Where did the 149 piece count for set 105 come from?
I don't know - there's no note on the source of that info... :/
maybe Todd or Suz remember?
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Some data on set 2_7
|
| (...) Hmm, let's see... Suz created the record and uploaded the photo on 26 Dec 1999; later, Joshua assigned some theme, year, piece-count info, and notes. Dan changed the piece count from 149 to 184. --Todd (26 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Some data on set 2_7
|
| (...) Certainly an interesting question. Of course it's possible the box cover is wrong for 2_7. It's also possible there's a difference in how to count compund pieces (like wheels), though I'm not sure this set has many wheels. It's also possible (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
