 | | Re: Following process and reducing clutter
|
|
(...) I thought about that too. While looking for a person's member number is a pain, it doesn't take that long. (Unless you are on dail-up.) And after all, Frank and Larry seem to have to remind people of the process semi-frequently, so why bother (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Following process and reducing clutter (was Re: Curator for sculpture group?
|
|
"John" <John@TCLTC.org> wrote in message news:Hw64DB.1x3r@lugnet.com... (...) hand (...) up. (I (...) up, (...) find (...) to the (...) True, it doesn't take that much time to look up a member. The problem is that every extra little step I have to (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Following process and reducing clutter (was Re: Curator for sculpture group?
|
|
(...) You must be a very busy person, but I'd bet that the time it took me to find (URL) this> is roughly equivalent to the time you took posting that. All I do is give... you trouble;-) JOHN (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Following process and reducing clutter (was Re: Curator for sculpture group?
|
|
(...) am not (...) always (...) on (...) reasons (...) group). (...) NNTP (...) workable (...) It used to be common to send out the "header" post to NNTP groups on a periodic basis. I forget the details of how it was done. I think Todd made a (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Following process and reducing clutter (was Re: Curator for sculpture group?
|
|
(...) It's not a nomination, this isn't an election, and seconds aren't really required or (from a clutter perspective) really useful, actually. In fact, no replies at all are necessary unless there's some reason to believe that the suggestion (not (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.curators)
|
