|
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I hate replying to my own posts and quoting dictionaries, today I shall do both: From: (URL) verb [T] to remove parts of (something to be read, seen, or heard) because it is offensive or considered morally wrong, or because it is secret She (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
internet
(score: 0.330)
|
|
| | Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
| (...) And here is where the problem with not 'getting' the internet comes in. Plus, the information is now in quite a few people's brains (not mine -- memory not good enough *grin*). Do they intend to wipe those clean? (...) Put another way -- (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.330)
|
|
| | Annual Membership Renewal.
|
| While the idea of a $10 lifetime membership sounds nice with the caveat that members should add to their membership contribution as they feel LUGNET adds value to their experiance, this is not practical. If you want a consistant flow of cash you (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.finance)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.330)
|
|
| | Re: Unable to connect via NNTP
|
| (...) minutes (...) the (...) I'm now getting errors when I *send* messages too... of the ones I sent yesterday, several took a long time to appear and one never got through at all - I got this message back: Your message has been enqueued and (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.329)
|
|
| | Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
| From what I've seen of this information leak, it's a case of shutting the gate *after* the horse has bolted. If six million people suddenly knew WW3 was coming, but shouldn't have, because of some government department's stuff-up in transferring the (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.329)
|
|
| | Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
| (...) I'm going to start by saying that I fully understand the Lugnet admins actions in this case. It's far better for the relationship with LEGO to move quickly and do what they request, and *then* follow up to see if it was right or not. But at (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.329)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.329)
|
|
| | E-mail authentication statistics?
|
| Hi there! I'm just curios, has the e-mail autentication thingie caught any ugly messages? I did a search in the administrative groups and the newest post seems to be seven months old. I know I've used option number two a couple of times but not any (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.329)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.329)
|
|
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.329)
|
|
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.329)
|
|
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.329)
|
|
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.329)
|
|
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.329)
|
|
| | Suggestion for -.loc. pages
|
| I hope this is the right place to post this. It would be really nice for people to be able to connect if there were a link in the -.loc. pages to show all the lugnet members that were in that locality. Regards, Steve Martin IndyLUG (23 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.328)
|
|
| |
|
service
(score: 0.328)
|
|
| |
|
service
(score: 0.327)
|
|
| | Re: So did you wonder about me?
|
| "Jake McKee" <jacob.mckee@america.lego.com> wrote in message news:G3oBzE.5yt@lugnet.com... (...) Glad to hear it! (...) actually (...) address. Understandable. (...) Note - you may want to develop a signature with your title at TLC in it, similar to (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
service
(score: 0.327)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.327)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.326)
|
