To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Search Results: internet mail service
 Results 1101 – 1120 of 2225.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: the latest news
 
(...) I think that if N can be defined by the users, this would work well. I personally think that if even one person rates a message that some information is better than none. However that's just me, and I think that new users would like to have N (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  New newsgroup lugnet.admin.terms
 
A new newsgroup lugnet.admin.terms has just been created for discussions, questions, and issues relating to the LUGNET Terms of Use Agreement, (URL) the surface, it seems kind of silly to have a whole newsgroup/mailing list devoted just to a (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)  
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: the latest news
 
(...) Currently, you're right. The rating system allows me to rate the "little guys" with good opinions up and the loud guys just blowing off steam down. Without ratings, whoever posts the most often gets seen the most. With ratings, I could (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: new posts send via e-mail
 
(...) Is this (1) OK on Lugnet? (...) To whom are you speaking? My minifigs can outwit your minifigs anyday. My basement has more DIMWTs in it, see? 1 - Star Trek quotes, and/or mild profanity somewhat bowdlerised... you decide which I was referring (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: new posts send via e-mail
 
(...) Not meaning to rub in some salt or anything, just a note: I, not being your avid star trek fan, didn't understand the quote nor the reference... (ST didn't tell me anything ;-)... I only read your post AFTER Larry's reply so I could get it, (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: new posts send via e-mail
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Shiri Dori writes: <snip> (...) Ooops... IWO != IOW... :-) -Shiri (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: New newsgroup lugnet.admin.terms
 
(...) I meant to say, "...to avoid increases of political nature as the community continues to grow." There is growing concern[1], for example, that things have started to become too political here. Whether or this is the case, or whether or not it (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: (Some snipping here, read Todd's post) (...) I think a combination of these could work well. The ratings could be hidden from public view, so that noone feels like they are being punished, and the server (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Did I read that yet?
 
Todd, I've heard some requests for this before, and I'd like to revisit it. Can we get some sort of flag to show whether we've read a message or not? When I go to another computer, flush out my cache, switch from Netscape to IE, etc, I can't tell if (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: Did I read that yet?
 
(...) OK, good. I understand that it would be some work and would like to see your time spent elsewhere as well. For example: (URL) much rather see this first. :) Ben Roller (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) I got p@$$\/\/0?oI through it as a 169. Mwhahahahahahaha! Alan (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) I meant to put in p@$$\/\/0roI in, but messed up. p@$$\/\/0roI got a 100% Alan (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Well, since you asked, I thought I'd leave mine. (...) This change could be for the better. I was fine with the 100 scale (I think the 5 scale gives less acurate results) but it's good if it makes rating easier for people. Hopefully this will (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?
 
(...) "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all". Gee thanks for reminding us Mom...er..Todd. ;) Ben Roller (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) I like + over *, but unless the !'s font is darker, it's worthless to me. I have fairly good eyes, but I can barely even see that the article is rated. Again, I introduce you to Mr. Dead Horse...Why not use 1-5 instead of !-!!!!!, *-*****, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: new posts send via e-mail
 
(...) I only use my at-home machine and I'm always logged in. (I have no idea what my password is) So, do I really need some other confirmation code to simply add a group to my rcv-by-email list? Wait! don't answer that. I'll assume it's a "yes." (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Re: new posts send via e-mail
 
(...) I'm sorry, you're right. I'll try to be more careful. (...) Sorry again. was an elbow dig at Todd because I don't usually comment on things like my experience with passwords and such. (To which he was quite good in reply) -Suz (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  New group lugnet.market.appraisal
 
A new newsgroup lugnet.market.appraisal has just been created. CHARTER/PURPOSE ===...=== lugnet.market.* (hierarchy): Auctioning, buying, selling, trading, exchanging, and shopping for LEGO® products -> lugnet.market.appraisal (group): Appraisals, (...) (25 years ago, 19-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.appraisal, lugnet.announce)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  Simplified News-by-Mail signup (was: New newsgroups for LEGO Direct and the LEGO Company)
 
(...) LEGO announcements group. Is awareness of the group still too low, or is the interface for mail subscriptions still too confusing? (It was designed for efficiently managing large numbers of groups simultaneously, but not for managing groups (...) (24 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce) ! 
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

  LUGNET Chat (revisited)
 
There was talk long ago, about a LUGNET chat.. mud/talker vs irc vs icq etc. But with simple java chat applets available everywhere, I thought it might be something for the 'white space' (eg (URL)) at the right of the view, although it should be (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 1.173)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR