|
 | | Re: Why NQC over Robolab?
|
| (...) I suspected as much. (...) Well crud. Now I'm going to have to go out and get one of those things. (...) Suffice to say, Robolab does not currently support the Spybot. Sounds like an interesting project though.... Tom (22 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|  
spybot
(score: 0.602)
|
|
| | navigation and communication
|
| Thank you Nathan. I think your link is really gonna help! Now do you know of any way making the robot calculating its position constatly? You see i want to make the robot send its position to another one so it can go there. Thank you again for your (...) (21 years ago, 24-May-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.602)
|
|
| | Re: navigation and communication
|
| (...) In theory you can find position by having a 'giant pantone chart' on the floor - a sheet of paper like the test pad with coloured squares on it, and use the light sensor to detect which square the robot is on. Has anyone tried this? It will be (...) (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.602)
|
|
| | Re: IR Control
|
| (...) Perhaps I should add Apple Event support to MacNQC - it wouldn't be too difficult. On the other hand, it may be more appropriate to build a smaller stand-alone app that serves as a bridge between Apple Events and RCX communication. Dave Baum (27 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
rcx, communication
(score: 0.601)
|
|
| |
|
spybot
(score: 0.601)
|
|
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.601)
|
|
| | Re: Motor Speed Control
|
| Hello Iain, (...) You should definitely try Dick Swan's 10x firmware ((URL) Among other goodies (interpretation speed for example ;o), it features more power levels (128 instead of 8), and a flag to modify behavior of PWM motor control. Standard (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
spybot
(score: 0.600)
|
|
| | Re: NQC 2.1 b2 in beta test
|
| (...) I think NQC should be strictly a compiler. It seems like it would be more manageable for both developers and users if the RCX communication pieces were in a separate executable. This change should make NQC completely portable (if there is such (...) (27 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
rcx, communication
(score: 0.599)
|
|
| | Re: Arrrgghhh!!!!! (part deux)
|
| (...) Pft. World of Warcraft, baby! (...) I read this far before I said "IE". Then I also said "Firefox". And probably "Reinstall, and/or Spybot S&D". (...) Try Spybot - it's actually pretty good at rooting these things out: (URL) (...) Cool! Sounds (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
spybot
(score: 0.599)
|
|
| | Communications
|
| I am looking for detailed information on RCX communication (computer to rcx, and rcx to rcx). I am also looking for detailed information on all devices, sensors, motors etc.. Could somebody point me to a site with some good information. Thank You. (...) (27 years ago, 5-Jan-95, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
rcx, communication
(score: 0.598)
|
|
| | Re: Sidebar new feature
|
| (...) Not at all. I love anything that helps increase communication between the clubs. I plan to keep it as a 'rolling' entry - that is, if SANDLUG's event comes up first, they will be at the top of the list. Ideally, this could be expanded into a (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.org.us.lugola, FTX)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.598)
|
|
| | Re: Arrrgghhh!!!!! (part deux)
|
| (...) Same problem with W2K. I used Spybot S&D (URL) and Adaware (URL) but it kept coming back... I eventually resorted to HijackThis (URL) which is definately the swiss army knife of spywareware removal tools. Doesn't actually identify spyware by (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
spybot
(score: 0.598)
|
|
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
| Dear Jake, Please don't take these sorts of email too seriously. I won't speak for anyone else but at least one of us AFOLs wholly supports this communication and, for that matter, the release itself. Thank you very much for all the work, time and (...) (21 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.597)
|
|
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
| (...) Jake, I wish you hadn't turned this into a personal issue when it is a corporate policy issue. Do you see the words "Jake McKee" anywhere in my post? Now the "rally round Jake" LUGNET defense mechanism has been activated, and anything I say (...) (21 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.597)
|
|
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.597)
|
|
| | Re: Förslag om tidsram för träffen
|
| Hej! Andréas Rootzén har en >: (...) Tjohoo!!! Jippi! Bravo! (...) Underbart. Jag vet inte ännu om jag kan komma hela helgen, eller om jag dyker upp endera dagen och drar mig hemmåt vid kvällningen. Men om vi inte ska börja förrän 13 på lördagen så (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-04, to lugnet.loc.se)
| |
|
spybot
(score: 0.596)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) You know, I have to agree on this. This would be a great step forward in understanding whether the communication taking place is with the admin Hat on or the admin Hat off. It seems like such a small thing, but it would go a long way in (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.596)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Whatever. But the issue remains, whose responsibility is it to ensure email communication works? LUGNET and the LUGNET admins? Or the user? This issue has come up before and while the admins will do what they can, it's not their responsibility (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.596)
|
|
| | Re: Posting Policy Changes
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote: ... (...) Wow! I had to search around even to find that feedback address. Since I rarely visit the front page (it's pretty much useless IMO) I never would have found it tucked away down at the bottom (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.596)
|
|
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.596)
|
