Results 881 900 of about 17000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
| | Re: Building equality one female minifig at a time.
|
| (...) Though I am radical in my decision to use only "fleshies" on our train layout (but using all of the tones of flesh), I am quite traditional when it comes to faces. I would be perfectly happy with all of my figs being good ol' smilies. What if (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jun-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| |
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
| | Re: Building equality one female minifig at a time.
|
| Hey, I highly agree. In my own theme-of-choice, castle, we get about one female fig for every 50 male figs. Of course, part of that is due to the over-emphasis on action and conflict, where most castle figs are knights and soldiers (traditionally (...) (17 years ago, 29-Jun-07, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| |
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
| | Re: Building equality one female minifig at a time.
|
| (...) That's not a bad workaround, as long as the printing on the faces remains gender-neutral. One need look no further than the Adventurers theme to see the problem there. But now that you mention it, that problem could be headed off (!) by (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jun-07, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| |
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
| | Re: Building equality one female minifig at a time.
|
| (...) I quite agree. Magnus has a point about what will sell, so I think the aim should be to make a few changes. I don't think the demand is for a perfect 50:50 split between minifigs across the range, but to start with a few changes. For example, (...) (17 years ago, 3-Jul-07, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
| | Re: Building equality one female minifig at a time.
|
| (...) Well of course you'd say all of that; you're a girl! Hardy har har. IMO you're right on the money with pretty much everything you wrote. I can think of no real justification for failing to include female minifigs in a much broader range of (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jun-07, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
| | Re: Building equality one female minifig at a time.
|
| (...) Surely we fans have lamented about this before, but like all classic topics, it is worthy of bringing up again every now and then so newer members of the community can share their thoughts. I also feel you presented yourself well, and the (...) (17 years ago, 1-Jul-07, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| |
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
| | Re: Building equality one female minifig at a time.
|
| (...) I pretty much concur with everything that you wrote. And I would be really curious to see what the sales figures (dollar wise) are for girl-oriented lines such as Paradisa, Scala and Clickits. Or even some trend lines. Or I'll settle for (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jun-07, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| |
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) |
|
|
| minifig (score: 0.421) | More: Next Page >>
|